Cases 11 - 20 of 411
Gabriel Kaimowitz v. Michigan Bar, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HILLEL KAIMOWITZ
Defendant:
MICHIGAN BAR, FLORIDA BAR, JOHN T. BERRY and others
Lark v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tunisia Lark
Defendant:
Sharne Thomas, David Vanwinkle, Zachary Defouw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James SmithIn re: James Smith
as 24-1103
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Cundiff v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CUNDIFF
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO, Franklin County Sheriff Office, Franklin County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford et al v. The U.S. Congress et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford, Jonah Gabriel JahJah T. Tishbite and Anthony Cook
Defendant:
The U.S. Congress, The Pope and The 194 Member States of the United Nations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Wright-Freeman
as 2:2023cv13271
Defendant:
Michael Wright-Freeman, Michael Wright, Brian Rasheen Washington and others
Plaintiff:
L. Gabrielle Freeman
Chambers v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Derrick Thompson, Gabriel Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Montenegro v. Vaco LLC
as 3:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Gabriel D. Montenegro
Defendant:
Vaco LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
