Cases 11 - 20 of 398
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hampton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Carla Hampton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hampton, Jr v Dickson County Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Adam Troy Hampton, Jr
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hampton v. Leeds
as 2:2023cv02379
Petitioner:
Charles Hampton
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Kemper Insurance
as 1:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Janice Hampton
Defendant:
Kemper Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rrenis Petrey v. Scott County Fiscal Court, et al
as 23-5269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RRENIS PETREY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT COUNTY FISCAL COURT, DEPUTY SHERIFF JERIC GREENLEAF, In his Individual and official Capacity, DEPUTY SHERIFF JOSH HUDNELL, In his Individual and official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
