Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Lotus Industries LLC et al v. Duggan et al
as 2:2016cv14112
Plaintiff:
Lotus Industries LLC , Gwendolyn Williams , Christopher Williams and others
Defendant:
Michael Duggan, Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, City of Detroit Downtown Development Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. Dewine et al
as 1:2016cv00975
Petitioner:
Clayton M. Bates, Rachel N. Parks, Beverly Croy and others
Respondent:
Richard M. Dewine, Anneka P. Collins, Donnie Barrerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
B. et al v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00757
Petitioner:
C. M. B., Rachael N. Parks, r-Lotus Justice and others
Respondent:
State Of Ohio, Highland Count Job and Family Services, Highland County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyzima v. Lotus Engineering, Inc.
as 4:2015cv13202
Plaintiff:
Steve Kyzima
Defendant:
Lotus Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lotus International Company v. TongFang Global, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11253
Plaintiff:
Lotus International Company
Defendant:
TongFang Global, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
TongFang Global, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Lotus International Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Currency $24,607 et al
as 2:2011cv10337
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency $24,607, Personal Property JP Morgan Chase Bank, Business Classic Checking Account number 740713490 Valued at $18,353.18, Currency $8,190 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Lotus Fund, LP et al v. Aaron et al
as 2:2009cv14555
Plaintiff:
Lotus Fund, LP and StraitGateFinancial, LLC
Defendant:
Joe Aaron and Wood, Hat and Silver, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
GD Deal Holdings, LLC v. Lotus Business Group, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01102
Plaintiff:
GD Deal Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Lotus Business Group, LLC, Traveler's Mart, LLC, Traveler's Mart, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
