Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 2:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lay v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Diangela Lay
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thurman v. Lay et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
James W Thurman and James Thurman
Defendant:
Mike Lay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lay v. Louisville Metro Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lay
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections, Wellpath and Wellpath Employees at LMDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Chariot et al (TV2)
as 2:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
James W Thurman
Defendant:
Bill Chariot, Mike Lay, Worm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCord et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Brittney Leann McCord, Nicholas David Shawl, Donald Wayne Jackson and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., James Hughey and Sherry Hughey
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Interstate Commerce Act
Lay v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carolyn Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Filing Error
as 5:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carolyn Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Lay v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2022cv11095
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamour Lay
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Miller v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Katherine Lay Miller
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
