Cases 11 - 20 of 302
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bredow v. Le et al
as 4:2024cv10979
Plaintiff:
Mark Wade Bredow
Defendant:
Le, Lindell, Shawn and others
Campbell v. Butler County Jail
as 1:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Le-Lon Campbell
Defendant:
Butler County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclachlan v. Monroe et al
as 1:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Andrew MacLachlan #844474 and Andrew Maclaclan
Defendant:
Nikki Monroe, Robert Crompton, Addie Briske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 5:2023cv12633
Plaintiff:
Van Phuc Le
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Page v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Randel Edward Page, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Tennessee, The, EPIC Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bates v. Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
as 2:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bates
Defendant:
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare doing business as Methodist North Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
