Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
R.J. Liebe Athletic Lettering Company v. Varsity Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2011mc00005
Plaintiff:
R.J. Liebe Athletic Lettering Company
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, Inc. , Varsity Spirit Corporation and Varsity Spirit Fashions & Supplies, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
John W. Simmons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv15177
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Johnson v. Heavenly Letter
as 10-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HEAVENLY LETTERS
Dalton v. Heavenly Letters et al
as 2:2010cv13173
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dalton
Defendant:
Heavenly Letters, Tia LNU and Jade Johnson
United States Postal Service v. National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO
as 1:2010cv01670
Plaintiff:
United States Postal Service
Defendant:
National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Johnson v. Heavenly Letters
as 2:2010cv12535
Plaintiff:
Robert L Johnson
Defendant:
Heavenly Letters
Johnson #123451 v. Heavenly Letters
as 1:2010cv00516
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Johnson #123451
Defendant:
Heavenly Letters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Adams v. Calhoun County Correctional Fa, et al
as 10-1521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MARTIN ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALHOUN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TOM JOHNSON, Health Care Administrator, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Barb (Nurse), also named as Joyce as identified in letter #4 and others
William Franklin v. USPS, et al
as 10-3286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, Letter Carriers Branch 43 NALC AFL-CIO, GROUP HEALTH ASSOCIATES (GHA) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
