Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Daniels v. USA
as 1:2016cv00561
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniels v. USA
as 1:2016cv00560
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Smith
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office, Sabrina Patterson, Marshall County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell #246238 v. MacLaren
as 2:2014cv00148
Petitioner:
Michael Daniel Mitchell #246238
Respondent:
Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Daniels v. USA
as 11-5009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Hampton Springs Development, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Wachovia Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Hampton Springs Development, LLC, Hampton Springs Construction, LLC and Michael Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hoza et al v. Jefferson County Teachers Association et al
as 3:2009cv00764
Plaintiff:
Sherry Hoza, Sherry Hoza, Sherry Hoza and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Teachers Association, Kentucky Education Association, National Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daniels v. Naimey et al
as 2:2009cv02124
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniels
Defendant:
Nahem Naimey and Joyce Anderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wachovia Bank v. Hampton Springs Development, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wachovia Bank
Defendant:
Hampton Springs Development, LLC, Hampton Springs Construction, LLC, Michael Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
