Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Evans v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. et al
as 3:2021cv01425
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Stacie L Evans and Christopher Dile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 2:2020cv10993
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2019cv00420
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shephard et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2017cv01377
Plaintiff:
Mary Shephard, Tammy Whalen and Tammy Whaley
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Prochnow v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2016cv02701
Plaintiff:
Leon W. Prochnow
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Leneway v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 2:2016cv13350
Plaintiff:
Rodney Leneway
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gross v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (TV3)
as 3:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Gross
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
