Cases 11 - 20 of 2,550
Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv11110
Plaintiff:
Nola Walker
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Walker v. Carbor et al
as 2:2024cv11093
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Kim Carbor, Marienfield, Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Alinda Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker #256640 v. Carbor et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniel Walker #256640
Defendant:
Kim Carbor, Unknown Marienfield, Unknown Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jade Pig Ventures - River Ridge LLC v. Walker, City of
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jade Pig Ventures - River Ridge LLC
Defendant:
Walker, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
West #367882 v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Zorrell West #367882
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Anderson, M. Desco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tony S. Walker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant:
Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
