Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Wooten v. USA
as 4:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Ronald Wooten
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas WootenIn re: Thomas Wooten
as 22-2154
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS WILLIAM WOOTEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12476
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
Wooten v. Tejeda et al (JRG1)
as 3:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Steve Wooten
Defendant:
Bryan Tejeda, A&M Transportation Service Group, Inc., FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wooten v. Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Wooten
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Lexington, John Doe, Lt. Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
James Wooten
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wooten v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv11856
Petitioner:
Thomas William Wooten
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Al-Kaysani v. Duke et al
as 1:2021cv01070
Defendant:
Joseph Lieberman, Bill Lee, Steve Bill and others
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Al-Kaysani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Lee et al
as 4:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jay Wooten
Defendant:
City of Tullahoma, Tennessee and Kenya Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
