Cases 21 - 30 of 2,827
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Doc Holidays, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Defendant:
Doc Holidays, Inc. doing business as Doc Holidays Bar & Grill and Dustin Hill
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Bruce Patrick Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Krout v. Revelette Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00782
Defendant:
Jonathan's Grille - Spring Hill, LLC, Jonathan's Grille Holdco, Inc., Jonathan's Grille - Providence, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Krout
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03405
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Plaintiff:
Rodrico Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cole v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00751
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center, Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamie Gavin, et al v. Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC, et al
as 24-1509
Defendant:
LADY JANE'S SUNSET HILLS MO, LLC, TIM MCCOLLUM, JESSE DHILLON and others
Plaintiff:
CHLOE KERTESZ, JAMIE GAVIN, JAMIE LINDQUIST and others
Procter v. Farmington Hills Police Department
as 2:2024cv11520
Plaintiff:
Clark Procter
Defendant:
Farmington Hills Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurst v. Auburn Hills Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv11522
Defendant:
Moore, Bryant and Auburn Hills Police Department
Plaintiff:
Arnold Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
