Cases 21 - 30 of 11,905
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Chae Harris, C.O. McKinley, C.O. J. Umstead and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Byrum v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Byrum
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, Glenn Jacobs, Tom Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith-El v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv11370
Plaintiff:
Sheik D. Smith-El
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dana Nessel, Detroit Land Bank Authority and others
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Butler et al.
as 3:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Brandy Sheldon Butler, Sheldon Brandy Butler, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02770
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02815
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Leon Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lemson et al v. Newaygo Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
W.L. and Robert Lemson
Defendant:
Newaygo Public Schools, Ben Gilpin, James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02698
Plaintiff:
Amelia Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
