Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Cockrell v. City Of Cincinnati et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00270
Plaintiff: Keith Cockrell
Defendant: City Of Cincinnati and David Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cockrell v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant: Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Bonnie Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cockrell v. SSA
as 6:2009cv00378
Plaintiff: Recarter Cockrell, Jr.
Defendant: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Weathington v. Evans et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv15267
Plaintiff: Janine Weathington
Defendant: Warren Evans, Jarield Heard, Detroit, City of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
In re: Alfred Cockrell
as 08-3272
Petitioner: In re: ALFRED COCKRELL
Hawkins v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2008cv10652
Plaintiff: Faustine Hawkins
Defendant: Wayne, County of, State of Michigan, Raymond Wojtowicz and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cockrel v. SSA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2008cv00032
Plaintiff: Recarter J. Cockrel, Jr.
Defendant: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Cockrell v. Brunsmans
as 2:2007cv01123
Petitioner: Alfred Cockrell
Respondent: Timothy Brunsmans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cockrell v. Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2007cv00956
Petitioner: Alfred Cockrell
Respondent: Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHIELDS, et al. vs. RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., et al.
as 1:2007cv00169
Plaintiff: James Sheilds, James Sheilds, James Sheilds and others
Defendant: Racetrac Petroleum Inc., Murphy Oil USA, Inc., The Pantry, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?