Cases 21 - 30 of 311
Beneteau #453276 v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Jacob Beneteau #453276, Jason L. Sanders #305405, Nicholas Bailey #970872 and others
Defendant:
John Davis, Unknown Smith, Unknown Greenfeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitty v. Conrad's Laserwash Company, Inc.
as 5:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
Sean N. Pitty
Defendant:
Conrad's Laserwash Company, Inc. doing business as Blue Falls Car Wash
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Elizalde v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv12526
Plaintiff:
Robert Elizalde
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Genesee County, Deputy Kristopher Pavlica and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dante' Stone v. Ann Smith, et al
as 23-5846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN BAILEY SMITH, STEVE CONRAD, THOMAS B. WINE and others
Dante' Stone v. Ann Smith, et al
as 23-5743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN BAILEY SMITH, STEVE CONRAD, THOMAS B. WINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1703
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Copeland v. Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jon Copeland
Defendant:
Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners, J. Steve Sheldon, Chuka D. Onyeneke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Scott County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Defendant:
Latosha Jordan Tucker, Scott County Detention Center, Jailer Derran Broyles and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Wilson et al
as 3:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Bryan Wilson, Steven Conrad, Robert Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
