Cases 21 - 30 of 30
In re: David William
as 12-8032
Debtor:
In re: DAVID DOWLEN WILLIAMS
Appellee:
WILLIAM MCSWAIN, JR. and GEORGIA G. MCSWAIN
Appellant:
DAVID DOWLEN WILLIAMS
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
David Doyle Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barry Rayner v. City of Louisville Metro, et al
as 10-5738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY WAYNE RAYNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOUISVILLE METRO, A Municipal Corporation, JERRY ABRAMSON, In his capacity as Mayor Louisville Metro, STEVE BESHEAR, Governor, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Type:
Other Statutes
Scott et al v. City of Louisville Metro et al
as 5:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Vincent Louis Scott and Barry Wayne Rayner
Defendant:
City of Louisville Metro, Jerry Abramson, Steve Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayner v. City of Louisville Metro et al
as 3:2009cv00488
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Rayner
Defendant:
City of Louisville Metro, Jerry Abramson, Steve Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kit Prescott
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Jeff Hale, Brian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. City of Dayton, Ohio et al
as 3:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Ohio, Anita M. Hauser, Maurice Louderback and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
