Cases 21 - 30 of 352
Figueroa v. Huron County, Ohio et al
as 3:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Figueroa
Defendant:
Huron County, Ohio, Huron County Commissioners, Huron County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Toshalyn Murray v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant:
TOM PYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENS COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ATHENS COUNTY, OH CHILDREN SERVICES, ATHENS CITY, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Consumers' Research, et al v. FCC, et al
as 22-4069
Petitioner:
CONSUMERS' RESEARCH, CAUSE BASED COMMERCE, INC., EDWARD J. BLUM and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hacker v. Gibbs
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hacker
Defendant:
Tyler Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
v. Gibbs et al
as 2:2022cv12668
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gibbs
Defendant:
Michigan Unemployment Agency and Julia Dale
Myers v. Daley et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
James Kline Myers
Defendant:
Jailer James Daley, Deven Rodriquez, Deputy Karl T. Markowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Tricia Gibbs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Patterson v. Gibbs et al
as 6:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gary Patterson
Defendant:
Casey Gibbs, M. Carroll, Joseph Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gibbs v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02363
Plaintiff:
Danielle Gibbs
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
