Cases 21 - 30 of 321
Sanderson v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sanderson and Nicholas Sanderson doing business as SCS Management
Defendant:
Eaton County, Christopher Garrison, Chris Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Anthony et al v. Van Over et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
William Anthony, PBA Martial Arts, Inc., Katie Baker and others
Defendant:
Barry Van Over, Myles Baker, Brent Seebohm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Griffith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03731
Plaintiff:
Lanny Griffith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keith v. Griffiths
as 1:2022cv01809
Plaintiff:
RITA KEITH
Defendant:
JAMES GRIFFITHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Griffith et al
as 2:2022cv12390
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Griffith, Todd Redman, K. Napier and others
Griffiths v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01760
Plaintiff:
Jessica Griffiths
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. Griffith
as 3:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
William Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv03503
Plaintiff:
Christina Griffith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Winburn v. Griffith et al
as 2:2022mc51188
Plaintiff:
Robert Winburn
Defendant:
Griffith, Todd Redman, K. Napier and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
