Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Buess v. Obama et al
as 3:2014cv01493
Plaintiff:
David Lee Buess
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Internal Revenue Service, Hancock Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bamrung Chumpia v. USPS, et al
as 14-5637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BAMRUNG P. CHUMPIA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, or President of Michigan State U., SECRETARY OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Pierce #F13921 v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv00543
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
Barack Obama, California Department of Corrections, California Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Meyer et al
as 2:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Miller , James E. Lehman, Jr. , Michele E. Ward-Tackett and others
Defendant:
Randall Meyer , State of Ohio Office of the Inspector General , Office of the Brown County Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millsape v. United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General
as 1:2013mc00110
Petitioner:
Gregory Millsape
Respondent:
United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General
Buess v. Obama et al
as 3:2013cv02209
Plaintiff:
David L. Buess
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Hancock Federal Credit Union, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DePinto v. Office of Inspector General
as 1:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Frank DePinto
Defendant:
Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
State of Tennessee, et al v. Kathy Noble
as 13-5752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, WILLIAM HASLAM, SCOTT FOSTER, Hendersonville Mayor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHY NOBLE
Banks v. Scarsborough et al
as 4:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Drew Scarsborough, Frank DeClair, Doug LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
