Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Christopher v. City of Madison Heights et al
as 4:2018cv12952
Defendant:
Corey Haines, Suzette Gysel, John Doe Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DIROFF
as 2:2018cv12127
Plaintiff:
PRINCE ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM DIROFF and John Doe officers 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2017cv13877
Plaintiff:
Eldreed Berry , Ruth Berry and Michael Tennon
Defendant:
Lynn Moore , John Doe Officers 1-10 and City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2017cv12457
Plaintiff:
Louis Harris
Defendant:
Oakland County , John Doe 1-5 Deputies , John Doe Deputies 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin et al v. City of Chattanooga et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Hanson Melvin and Tarah Melvin
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , David Campbell and John Doe Officers 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downard v. Martin et al
as 2:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Karen Downard
Defendant:
Russell L. Martin, John Doe Officers and Unknown Psychologist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzo Johnson v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 17-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN RATA, Officer and others
Woolf v. City of Alliance et al
as 5:2017cv00779
Plaintiff:
William L. Woolf
Defendant:
City of Alliance , Christopher D. McCord , James L. Hilles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Walgreen's Pharmacy et al
as 2:2017cv10455
Plaintiff:
Alisa Mary Sanderson
Defendant:
Walgreen's Pharmacy , Dearborn Heights Police Officer D. Herr and Various Unknown John Doe Officers of Dearborn Heights Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
