Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Amble et al v. Spangler et al
as 3:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
curtis lane, alonzo hoskins, robert thomas and others
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, Knox County, TN, Bernie Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Quest Liner, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Johnson
Defendant:
Quest Liner, Inc., Robert Thomas Linnenbrink, John Does #4-8 and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Johnson v. Quest Liner, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Johnson
Defendant:
Quest Liner, Inc., Robert Thomas Linnenbrink, John Does #4-8 and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Okuley et al v. Linnenbrink et al
as 3:2018cv00624
Plaintiff:
John Okuley and Gina Langen
Defendant:
Robert Thomas Linnenbrink , Quest Liner, Inc. , Erie Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Robert Thomas Payne
as 2:2018mc00027
Respondent:
Robert Thomas Payne
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Thomas, III v Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Thomas, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huffman v. Linnenbrink et al
as 3:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Huffman
Defendant:
Robert Thomas Linnenbrink, Quest Liner, Inc. and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Irvin v. William Haynes, Jr., et al
as 17-5612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Senior United States District Judge, THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice
Irvin v. Haynes et al
as 3:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
William Joseph Haynes, Jr., The Judicial Branch of the United States Government and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
