Cases 21 - 30 of 120
USA v. Immanuel Roddy
as 17-3676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IMMANUEL RODDY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roddy v. Southern Recycling, LLC
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ronald Roddy
Defendant:
Southern Recycling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prophet v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2017cv00902
Defendant:
Ken Mills, Ronald L. Shobert, Kenneth Kochevar and others
Plaintiff:
Roddy Prophet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmad Bishawi v. NEOCC, et al
as 17-3319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD BISHAWI
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, RODDIE RUSHING, Warden, Former and others
USA v. Real Property at 304 Roddy Ln, et al
as 17-5190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 304 RODDY LANE, HARRIMAN, TENNESSEE 37748 and ETHEL RODDY-STRICKLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roddy Lyles, et al v. RDP Company, et al
as 16-6346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODDY LYLES, Executor of the Estate of Pat Lyles, JANICE N. COPE, CHARLES S. STORY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RDP COMPANY, a Delaware Statutory Trust, MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC., a North Carolina corporation and LAFARGE WEST, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation
Roddy v. Sebring
as 2:2016cv11676
Plaintiff:
Christina M Roddy
Defendant:
R. K. Sebring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Roddis et al v. National Seating and Mobility, Incorporated
as 2:2016cv10152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roddis and Catherine Roddis
Defendant:
National Seating and Mobility, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
