Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Baffert et al v. Churchill Downs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Bob Baffert and Bob Baffert Racing Stables, Inc.
Defendant:
Churchill Downs, Inc., William C. Carstanjen and R. Alex Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokley et al v. Farmer et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dwayne Stokley, Jr., Timothy Smith and Austin Rankin
Defendant:
Director Lisa Farmer, Corizon Medical and Trinity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Phillips et al
as 2:2021cv02758
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rankins
Defendant:
Wesley Scott Phillips, Boston Scientific, Regional One Hospital/Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Rankin v. Berrien County, MI
as 21-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BERRIEN COUNTY, MI
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Rankins v. Nickels et al (TV2)
as 1:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Lamond Rankins
Defendant:
Jeremy Nickels and Crete Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Castanon v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11942
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castanon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Robert Rankin and General Teamsters Local Union No. 406
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
gobah v. City of Hamtramck et al
as 2:2021cv11828
Plaintiff:
joshua gobah
Defendant:
City of Hamtramck, Brian Thome, Justin Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
