Cases 31 - 40 of 76
City of Harrisonville, Cass County, Missouri et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45369
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt PLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Harrisonville, Cass County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CHOATE et al
as 2:2019cv02186
Plaintiff:
NEAL TECHNOLOGIES,INC
Defendant:
CASS J. CHOATE and ABRIANNA CHOATE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Crawford v. Keene et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Defendant:
Tim Keene, Kevin Cook, Cass County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cass County, Missouri v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45841
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cass County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Cass, Michigan v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45868
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Cass, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Craigo v. Behnke et al
as 1:2018cv00739
Defendant:
Susanne Salisbury, Cass County Jail, Richard J. Behnke and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Craigo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scripps v. Agency for the Performing Arts, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Cass B. Scripps
Defendant:
Agency for the Performing Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Cass Bethea
as 16-2584
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CASS LAVELL BETHEA
Cass v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2016cv00193
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Cass and David Cass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
