Cases 31 - 40 of 308
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron et al v. The Medical Protective Company Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron, James Albers, Jimmy Allen and others
Defendant:
Administratrix Ashisha Wallace, The Medical Protective Company Inc., MedPro Group Inc., f/k/a Medical Protective Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shaver v. M.D.O.C.
as 2:2023cv10886
Plaintiff:
Dawson Shaver
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Jones and S.M.T. Dental
Shaver v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv10895
Plaintiff:
Dawson Douglas Shaver
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Green v. City of East Liverpool et al
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Green
Defendant:
City of East Liverpool, Gregory Bricker, David Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 4:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Green
Defendant:
City of East Liverpool, Gregory Bricker, David Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dawson v. Mock
as 0:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cozart v. Dawson
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cozart
Defendant:
f/n/u Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toshalyn Murray v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant:
TOM PYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENS COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ATHENS COUNTY, OH CHILDREN SERVICES, ATHENS CITY, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Dawson-Day v. Farris
as 2:2023cv10045
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dawson-Day
Defendant:
Kim Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
