Cases 31 - 40 of 3,161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Burnett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, in her official capacity, LIEUTENANT TAGGET, in individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BORIS, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kevin Burke v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al
as 24-3222
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P. BURKE
Defendant:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, EMMA COLLINS, Warden, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Elizabeth Nelson, et al v. Service Towing, Inc., et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NELSON and ALBERT D. THROWER
Defendant:
SERVICE TOWING, INC., ABLE TOWING, LLC, EDWARD D. HERTZ, President and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Kelmendi v. Michigan Office of Retirement Services, et al
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. KELMENDI, Doctor
Defendant:
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF RETIREMENT SERVICES, DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
