Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Southland Health Services, Inc. et al v. Bank Plus et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Southland Health Services, Inc. , Paladin Holdings, Inc. and Larry N Lunan
Defendant:
Bank Plus , Clanton Dubose, Dudley Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dubose v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Dubose
Defendant:
Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson and Dubose v. Davis International et al
as 4:2011cv00950
Plaintiff:
Anderson and Dubose, Inc.
Defendant:
Davis International, Inc. and GA Commerce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
DuBose v. Kasich et al
as 2:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
Bobby-Ray DuBose
Defendant:
John Kasich , Mitchell J Brown , Jim Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dubose v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv00428
Petitioner:
Immanuel Dubose
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DuBose v. Napoleon et al
as 2:2010cv11157
Plaintiff:
Garnett DuBose
Defendant:
Benny Napoleon, Kym L Worthy, Robert Stevens and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
DuBose v. Oakland, County of, et al
as 2:2009cv14775
Plaintiff:
Reney DuBose
Defendant:
Oakland, County of, Oakland County Sheriff's Department, Kellie Forton and others
United States of America v. Dubose
as 2:2009cv13188
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmetta Dubose
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
United States of America v. Dubose
as 2:2009cv13187
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmetta Dubose
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
