Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Jones v. Parrish et al
as 4:2014cv13153
Plaintiff:
Tremain Jones
Defendant:
Lynn Parrish, D. Maynard, Jay Kimbill and others
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Verhovec v. City of Trotwood et al
as 3:2014cv00363
Plaintiff:
Edward Verhovec
Defendant:
City of Trotwood , Michael J Lucking , Stephen M. McHugh and others
Counter_claimant:
Stephen M. McHugh , Michael J Lucking , City of Trotwood and others
Counter_defendant:
Edward Verhovec , William E. Walker, Jr., R. Paul Cushion, II and others
Consol_defendant:
Christopher R Conard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Jerry Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Agri-Power, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
William (Billy) E. Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Agri-Power, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014mc00252
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Jerry Lester and others
Anitra Crawford v. Randall Stephenson, et al
as 13-2664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITRA E CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL STEPHENSON, AT AND T, MICHELE MEEKS and others
Dotson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013cv01135
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Charles E. Walker, Deborah Housel, Monte D. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013mc00087
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Charles E. Walker, Deborah Housel, Monte D. Watkins and others
United States of America et al
as 4:2013mc00071
Petitioner:
United States of America
Claimant:
Henry E. Walker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
