Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 174
Daryl Smith v. Randee Rewerts
as 19-1431
Petitioner / Appellant: DARYL E. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Mary Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5302
Plaintiff / Appellee: KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, in its capacity as separate Trustee of Matawin Ventures Trust Series 2016-2
Defendant / Appellant: MARY E SMITH
Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant: Harry Nguyen, M.D., HPR Clinic, LLC and Ryan Fryman, M.D.
Plaintiff: Betty E Smith and Betty E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Smith v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10330
Defendant: Amanda Menchinger, Wallace E. Smith, Joan E. Smith and others
Plaintiff: Martin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: William E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnes v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00608
Defendant: Philip E. Smith, Yvette Y. Cain, State of Tennessee Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff: Harvey Burnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff: Richard Barrow
Defendant: Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Holton et al
as 2:2018cv00674
Plaintiff: Richard Barrow
Defendant: Toby Holton, Tony Barrett, Kolesar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Smith (JRG3)
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff: Kondaur Capital Corporation
Defendant: Mary E Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?