Cases 31 - 40 of 2,651
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Staggs v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Henry Staggs
Defendant:
Justin Hill, Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. and Landstar Inway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, PC et al
as 2:2024cv10619
Plaintiff:
Henry Nirenberg
Defendant:
COUZENS, LANSKY, FEALK, ROEDER & LAZAR, P.C.,, Jack S Couzens, SADECKI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Henry v. Parr-Mirza et al
as 2:2024cv10595
Plaintiff:
Arnold V Henry
Defendant:
Parr-Mirza, B. Schaschko, Angela Joseph and others
Henry v. Clotfelter et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Henry
Defendant:
Eric Clotfelter, Wayne Barton, II, Mike Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Henry Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens v. Wineman, III
as 2:2024cv10406
Plaintiff:
David Owens
Defendant:
Henry Wineman, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGowan v. City of LaVergne, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Henry Ty McGowan
Defendant:
City of LaVergne, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Russell v. Henry et al.
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Patrick Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher Henry, Officer Riee, Nurse Amanda Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
