Cases 31 - 40 of 639
Nisbett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Ryan Merven Nisbett
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioner, 201 Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RoBEX LLC v. Palo et al
as 3:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
RoBEX, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Palo, Robert Holmes, Michael Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Holmes v. IRS Disclosure Office et al
as 2:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes and Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
IRS Disclosure Office, John A. Carpenter and A. Oyenekan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Resch v. Arthur Campfield, et al
as 23-1152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MARCUS RESCH
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR DUDLEY CAMPFIELD, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, JEREMY BUSH and others
Mart v. Parrott et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mart, Jr.
Defendant:
Adam Parrott, Lauren Massey, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Adrian Holmes
as 23-5012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADRIAN S. HOLMES
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Whitlock et al
as 3:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Erica Holmes
Defendant:
Justin Whitlock and A&N Freight Services, LLC
Interested Party:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
