Cases 31 - 40 of 223
Cady v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv11081
Plaintiff:
Irvin Cady
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudgins, Jr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Irvin Hudgins, JR
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Eichenberger v. Terri Jamison, et al
as 20-4158
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRI B. JAMISON, MAXINE C. IRWIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND L. EICHENBERGER
Ludowici Roof Tile, Inc. v. Restoremasters, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05469
Defendant:
Restoremasters, LLC, Restore Masters Contracting, LLC, Justin Reichl and others
Plaintiff:
Ludowici Roof Tile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Robert Irvin v. City of Clarksville, TN, et al
as 20-6186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant / Appellee:
AUSTIN PEAY, VII, Esquire, the duly constituted Delinquent Tax Attorney for said county, JIM DURRETT, County Mayor, JOE PITTS, current City Mayor and others
Marable v. Jacob et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Defendant:
McHerrin River Regional Jail and Lt. Jacob
Plaintiff:
William Irvin Marable, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02753
Defendant:
Jermicha L. Fomby, Absolute Wireless, Robert Hartline and others
Plaintiff:
Raven Patrice Jones
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Irvine v. Phillips
as 5:2020cv02109
Respondent:
Warden Michael Phillips
Petitioner:
Davon M Irvine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
The City of Clarksville, Ted Crozier, Jr., Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation
as 2:2020cv12389
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation
Plaintiff:
Gregory Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
