Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Royster v. Trierweiler
as 2:2017cv10101
Petitioner:
Bryant Lamont Royster
Respondent:
Tony Trierweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nettles v. Michigan Supreme Court Clerk et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Beverley R. Nettles
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court Clerk, Larry S. Royster, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royster v. Imbrogno et al
as 2:2016cv01174
Petitioner:
Jerome Royster
Respondent:
Andre Imbrogno and The Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Meyer et al
as 2:2016cv14194
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Lashawn Williams
Defendant:
Inger Meyer, Larry S. Royster, Peter Dishnaw and others
Charles Steele, et al v. Charlotte Jenkins, et al
as 16-4205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES M. STEELE and JEROME ROYSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE JENKINS, [UNKNOWN] PARKS, Sherman School Principal, CATHY PUMMILL and others
Doe v. Baum et al
as 2:2016cv13174
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
David H. Baum , Susan Pritzel , Tabitha Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Campbell v. Jeff Mills, et al
as 16-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MARSHALL CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF MILLS, Clerk, in his personal capacity and LARRY S. ROYSTER, Clerk, in his personal capacity
Steele et al v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Steele and Jerome Royster
Defendant:
Charlotte Jenkins, Parks, Cathy Pummill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell #158580 v. Mills et al
as 1:2016cv00339
Plaintiff:
David Marshall Campbell #158580
Defendant:
Jeff Mills and Larry S. Royster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Robinson v. Larry Royster
as 16-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL A. ROBINSON, named on initiating document as Darryl Anthony Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY S. ROYSTER, Chief Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
