Cases 31 - 40 of 22,826
Keller v. $1,097,074 in United States Currency
as 5:2024mc50986
Plaintiff:
James S. Keller
Interested Party:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,097,074 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Woodall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Woodall
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scott v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00998
Petitioner:
James R. Scott
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Swader
as 3:2024cv00999
Defendant:
Shatika Swader
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Health Care Fraud
Browning v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Defendant:
David Gabbard, Warden John Gilley, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson-Brown v. USA
as 2:2024cv12144
Petitioner:
LaTonya Richardson-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2024cv01406
Petitioner:
Kenneth Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States Of America v. Martin
as 2:2024cv03845
Defendant:
Kevin Martin
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Easterling v. Mistry et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kevin Easterling
Defendant:
United States of America and Savita Mistry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
McComb v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02584
Petitioner:
Anthony D McComb, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
