Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,554
Walker v. Howard
as 2:2024cv10686
Petitioner: Jimmie Walker, Jr.
Respondent: Jeff Howard
Alphonso Walker v. James Corrigan
as 24-1208
Petitioner: ALPHONSO DERAY WALKER
Respondent: JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. DuraServ Corp et al
as 2:2024cv02166
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant: DuraServ Corp and Dan Walker Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Walker v. Coleman Professionals Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00419
Plaintiff: Sarah Walker
Defendant: Coleman Professionals Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Walker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00985
Plaintiff: Roger Walker
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant: McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Cantrell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Larry O'Neal Walker, II
Defendant: Chief Cantrell, Keith Gregory, Sgt. Andy Howdeshell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC v. Mortgage Solutions FCS, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv10376
Plaintiff: United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC
Defendant: Mortgage Solutions FCS, Inc. and Ramon Walker
Walker et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff: Natasha Walker and Nathan Walker
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Karklin v. O'Bell Winn, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff: JAMES ROY KARKLIN
Defendant: O'BELL T. WINN, GARY MINIARD, CARROLL WALKER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?