Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Muentes v. Wilderness Development Corporation
as 3:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Cindy Muentes
Defendant:
Wilderness Development Corporation doing business as Wild Waterdome Indoor Waterpark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03063
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teresa Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuhl et al v. Fields et al
as 2:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Brett Eyckmans, Marc Fields, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kuhl and Kathleen Kuhl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2021cv00715
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Wilder
3Rd Party Defendant:
Transform Innovel Solutions, LLC, John Doe Corporations and Innovel Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobs v. Wilder et al
as 4:2020cv00051
Defendant:
City of Manchester, Tennessee and Michael Wilder
Plaintiff:
Danny Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv05440
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wilder Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moniz v. Weipert et al
as 2:2020cv12705
Defendant:
Richard A. Bernstein, Brian K. Zahra, Monroe County Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Moniz
Coleman et al v. Wilderness Development of TN Corporation
as 3:2020cv00345
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jean Coleman and Jerry Neal Coleman
Defendant:
Wilderness Tennessee Venture No. 3, LLC, Wilderness Ventures Holding Company, LLC, Wilderness Tennessee Venture No. 1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 2:2020cv00141
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Marbeth Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAteer v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Tatiana Skonka, Ofc. Rodriguez, Sgt. R. Meadows and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Henry McAteer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
