Cases 41 - 50 of 815
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
LIV Transportation Inc. v. Robert et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
LIV Transportation Inc.
Defendant:
Stone Robert and STI Freight Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dante' Stone v. Ann Smith, et al
as 23-5743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN BAILEY SMITH, STEVE CONRAD, THOMAS B. WINE and others
HOMECARE RX, INC. v. Kaser et al
as 2:2023cv02625
Plaintiff:
HOMECARE RX, INC.
Defendant:
April Kaser and Eric Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dante' Stone v. John Minton, Jr., et al
as 23-5727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN D. MINTON, JR., UNKNOWN KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ERIN HOFFMAN-YANG and others
Warwick v. City of Detroit, et al
as 2:2023cv11779
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mike Duggan, Mary Sheffield and others
Owens #829102 v. Briske et al
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Jarmal Owens #829102
Defendant:
Addie Briske, Candi Mason, Jack Bellinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Jena L. Stone
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stone v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv02414
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
William Stone
Defendant:
Demarcus Davis and Delta Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
