Cases 41 - 50 of 4,200
Smith v. McKesson Corporation et al.
as 1:2024op45003
Plaintiff:
Terri Simone Smith
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Forrest S. Watson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Merchant v. Watson's Installation, LLC
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Corey Merchant
Defendant:
Watson's Installation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. James Watson
as 24-3002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES F. WATSON
Loweth v. Revolution Trucking, LLC et al.
as 1:2023cv02438
Plaintiff:
Morgan Loweth
Defendant:
Revolution Trucking, LLC, James Adams and Brian Watson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schubert v. Watson
as 2:2023cv04231
Petitioner:
Alan Schubert
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton #941610 v. Perry et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tony Hamilton #941610
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Lakanen, Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson, et al v. IRG RC Hotel I, LLC
as 5:2023cv02342
Plaintiff:
Norenda Watson, DeAsha Hooks and De'Asha Hooks
Defendant:
IRG RC Hotel I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Watson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Rachel Watson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Xavier Torres v. Stewart County, TN School System, et al
as 23-5971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XAVIER TORRES
Defendant / Appellee:
STEWART COUNTY, TN SCHOOL SYSTEM, DR. BENJAMIN DUNCAN, in his individual capacity, TAMMY GRAY, in her individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
