Cases 41 - 50 of 557
Norrod v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jared Alan Norrod
Defendant:
Core Civic, Vinnie Vantell, Korja Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. McDuffie et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Shawn Andrea Roberson Sims and United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
Mary McDuffie, John Collins and Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norrod v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jared Alan Norrod
Defendant:
Core Civic, Vinnie Vantell, Korja Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. McCloud et al
as 2:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Sims
Defendant:
C/O McCloud, Cynthia Davis, Jeremy Oppy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sparks v. Teodosio et al
as 5:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Sparks
Defendant:
Thomas Teodosio, Sherri Bevan Walsh, Susan Baker Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Peterson v. David et al
as 2:2023cv10089
Plaintiff:
Toran Peterson
Defendant:
David, Sims, Loxton and others
Keith Sims, Jr. v. David Gray
as 23-3015
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH MAS SIMS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID W. GRAY, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sims v. Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 2:2022cv04357
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Sims
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Captain Forley, Major-Chief of Security John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
