Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Thompson v. Maximum Correctional Center, Davidson County Jail
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
Anton Thompson
Defendant:
Maximum Correctional Center, Davidson County Jail and Maximum Correctional Center, Davidson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00610
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office and Daron Hall
Plaintiff:
Anton Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02443
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States District Court, Warden Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Anton Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. State of Tennessee District Attorney General's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00502
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Thompson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee District Attorney General's Office and Glen Funk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cousins v. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Anton Cousins
Defendant:
Rick Rogers, C.P.T Abrams, S.G.T. Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Harb
as 2:2018cv11481
Plaintiff:
James Carter
Defendant:
Anton Harb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Joyner
as 3:2018cv00423
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Thompson
Defendant:
Ruby Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukaj et al v. OfficeMax North America,Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10301
Plaintiff:
Anton Dukaj and Nova Dukaj
Defendant:
OfficeMax North America,Inc. , Office Depot, Inc. and Global Furniture, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Alexander v. KY Cabinet for Health & Fam, et al
as 17-5879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, MIKE O'CONNELL, MARIA LEWIS and others
Makino Inc. et al v. Hoettel et al
as 1:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
Makino Inc. and Global E.D.M., Inc.
Defendant:
Anton J. Hoettel, Randy Lobenstein and Jeffrey Lofgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
