Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Jones v Taylor, City of et al
as 2:2014cv11847
Plaintiff:
Dominick Jones
Defendant:
Taylor, City of , Jeffrey Graves , Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. CareSource
as 1:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Brenda Diggs
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Young Americans for Liberty at The University of Michigan v. Coleman et al
as 5:2013cv15193
Plaintiff:
Young Americans for Liberty at The University of Michigan
Defendant:
Mary Sue Coleman, E. Royster Harper, Susan Pile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford et al v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Harley Crawford, Donovan Diggs and Jessica Michelle Parks
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, Wayne Anderson, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROLLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Butzbaugh et al
as 1:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Alfred M. Butzbaugh, Auther J. Cotter, M. Louise Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v Paragon Management Group, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jacqulyn M Diggs
Defendant:
Paragon Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins et al v. City of Toledo et al
as 3:2013cv01920
Plaintiff:
Joseph Collins , J. Bart Collins and Jesup Collins
Defendant:
City of Toledo, Michael Navarre, Derrick Diggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dudley v. Dennis et al
as 3:2012cv02255
Plaintiff:
Clinton D. Dudley
Defendant:
Jim Dennis, Gene Zmuda, Linda Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Weber & Olcese, PLC.
as 2:2012cv13396
Plaintiff:
Patricia Diggs
Defendant:
Weber & Olcese, PLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brenda Diggs v. United States Postal Service
as 12-3879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA J DIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, POSTMASTER GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
