Cases 41 - 50 of 102
SOLANO-MORETA v. SESSIONS et al
as 3:2018cv11657
Plaintiff:
Jorge Solano-Moreta
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions and Thomas Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thigpen v. Kane et al
as 3:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Brody Neill Kane, John Wootten, Jr., Comer Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. USA
as 2:2018cv11442
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kanee Goode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kane v. AVI Foodsystems, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
Brian Kane
Defendant:
AVI Foodsystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gilbert-Bey v. Kane et al
as 0:2017cv00097
Petitioner:
Reginald Thaddeus Gilbert-Bey
Respondent:
Tim Kane, Bureau of Prisons and Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thigpen v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv00919
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Brody Kane, Gwendolyn Cripps, Herbert Slatery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Patrick Kane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Alamoudi v. Lynch et al
as 0:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Abdurahman Muhammad Alamoudi
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Thomas R. Kane, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Hough v. Jodie Snyder-Norris, et al
as 16-6271
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN HOUGH, aka Jonathan Tyrone Hough
Respondent - Appellee:
JODIE L. SNYDER-NORRIS, Warden, FCI Ashland, Kentucky
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE, Acting Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and DONALD B. VERRILLI, Solicitor General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
