Cases 41 - 50 of 52
USA v. Jason Mize
as 10-5148
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON EUGENE MIZE
Dyson v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Randy Dyson
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio, Jason Mize, Jerome Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luther Gray v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 09-6219
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUTHER GRAY, aka Khalil-Ullah Abdul Al-Muhaymin
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK ANDERSON, Sheriff, Marion County, Indianapolis, IN, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. and BRET MIZE, Warden
Luther Gray v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 09-6219
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUTHER GRAY, aka Khalil-Ullah Abdul Al-Muhaymin
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK ANDERSON, Sheriff, Marion County, Indianapolis, IN, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. and BRET MIZE, Warden
Rushanda Mize v. Ralph Tedford, et al
as 09-1775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSHANDA MIZE
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH TEDFORD and CITY OF FLINT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Corbett et al v. Hamblen County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
William D Corbett and Carolyn S Corbett
Defendant:
Hamblen County, Tennessee, Hamblen County Commission, Esco R Jarnigan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Mize et al
as 5:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Lee Mize and Kentucky Housing Corporation
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Mize v. Tedford et al
as 2:2008cv10660
Plaintiff:
Rushanda Mize
Defendant:
Ralph Tedford and Flint, City of
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mize v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2007cv00176
Petitioner:
Walter Ray Mize
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
