Cases 41 - 50 of 437
James Woodhead v. Zakary Ridener, et al
as 22-5533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WOODHEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
ZAKARY RIDENER, Lexington, KY Police Officer, Individually and KEITH MCKINNEY, Lexington, KY Police Officer, Individually
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paul Abbott, et al v. USA
as 22-5492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL W. ABBOTT, TONI L. ABBOTT, BRITTANY N. ADKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Henry Talley v. McKinney, et al
as 22-5443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY DARNELL TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCKINNEY, LIEUTENANT GABRIEL NEEDHAM, LIEUTENANT SHORTER and others
McKinney v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv02292
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
M. Kathleen McKinney
Amicus Curiae:
Workers United
Stump et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Richard Stump, Jean Stump, Earl Stanley and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Herman McKinney v. Bert Boyd
as 22-5316
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN MCKINNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
BERT C. BOYD
USA v. Daniel McKinney
as 22-3246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL MCKINNEY
McKinney et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Justin McKinney and Anna McKinney
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R BARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
