Cases 41 - 50 of 315
Lyle v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
Reese Lyle
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2022md03025
In Re:
In Re: Proctor & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation and In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Erik Velasques, Frank Ortega, Matthew Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Charles Jackson v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 22-3253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, et al. and JOHN DOES 1-4
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH MASILONIUS, Badge #1957, MICHEALENE TALIANO, Badge #383, FRANK GEDEON, Badge #2413 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BARBARA RHODES MARBURGER
Cedeno v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Stuart A Friedman, Ronnie Ducoff, Timothy J. McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 1:2021cv01679
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Joseph Masilonis, Michealene Taliano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. O.D.R.C., et al
as 3:2021cv01398
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
O.D.R.C., Rocco Townsend and Tim Sturgis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar Reese v. Richard Bowen
as 21-3595
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR REESE
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and RICHARD BOWEN, Warden
USA v. Terrell Reese
as 21-2652
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRELL REESE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reese #640694 v. West et al
as 1:2021cv00492
Defendant:
B. West and T. Antes
Plaintiff:
Robert Reese #640694
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. State of Ohio
as 3:2021cv00993
Petitioner:
Shawn Reese
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
