Cases 41 - 50 of 377
Maria Garcia-Torres v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3564
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE GARCIA-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Alvarez Torres v. Dyerburg Grecian Steak House, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02354
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Alvarez Torres
Defendant:
Dyerburg Grecian Steak House, Inc. and Xristos Sakarelos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Torres v. Niles Pines Mobile Estates et al
as 1:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Michael Torres
Defendant:
Niles Pines Mobile Estates and Roy Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Ricardo Torres Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3317
Petitioner:
RICARDO TORRES HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGilary #703139 v. Goodspeed et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Duane McGilary #703139
Defendant:
J. Goodspeed, J. Torre, P. Setzes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
Francisco G. Torres
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marisa Chinchia-De Torres, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3180
Petitioner:
MARISA DEL CARMEN CHINCHIA-DE TORRES, CHRISTIAN JOSUE TORRES-CHINCHIA and NATHALIE BERSABE TORRES-CHINCHIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Vargas-Torres v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01238
Plaintiff:
Damian Vargas-Torres
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jose Torres-Guardado v. Warden, Big Sandy USP
as 22-5128
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL TORRES-GUARDADO
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, BIG SANDY USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
