Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 19,495
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03174
Plaintiff: Billy Williams
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03175
Plaintiff: Nicole Williams
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11491
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Coursey v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Larry R. Coursey
Defendant: Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe (JDC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff: John Doe (JDC)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowdy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03134
Plaintiff: William R Dowdy, Jr.
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. Publishers Clearing House New York Sweepstakes
as 1:2024cv01120
Plaintiff: William Scott Howard, Sr
Defendant: Publishers Clearing House New York Sweepstakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff: John Doe (RLM)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff: Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant: The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: Travis B Williams
Defendant: United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?