Cases 51 - 60 of 704
Epps v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Alicia A Epps
Defendant:
United States of America, Carl Lindner, III, Jeff Berding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael ChandlerIn re: Michael Chandler
as 22-3874
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL MURRAY CHANDLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walter Coffey v. Carol Neithercut, et al
as 22-1887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER C. COFFEY, III
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL NEITHERCUT, ANGELA LASHER, BAY VIEW REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Murray v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Chad Murray and Chad A. Murray
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company and Holman Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Johnson v. Mays et al
as 3:2022cv00442
Defendant:
Tobie Lynn Mays, Tobie Johnson, Tobie Tubbs and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Paddock Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2022mc51346
Respondent:
Paddock Enterprises, LLC
Petitioner:
Aldrich Pump LLC and Murray Boiler LLC
Pacheco v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv11927
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pacheco, Jeffrey King, Brian Sutton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Taylor v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Taylor
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, O.I.C. f/n/u Borden, O.I.C. f/n/u Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrow v. Dayton Living Word et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barrow
Defendant:
Dayton Living Word, Jackie Murray, Pat Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
