Cases 51 - 60 of 1,304
John Pierce v. Bryan Morrison
as 23-1723
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN EARL PIERCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sherman #869327 v. Niemi et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
William Earl Sherman #869327
Defendant:
Unknown Niemi, Unknown Velmer, Unknown Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Daniel Colbert
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Armond Budish, Earl Leiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, S Floyd, Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. E.J.H. Construction, Inc.
as 4:2023cv11742
Plaintiff:
Earl J Hale
Defendant:
E.J.H. Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Derryn-Nicole Jones, Dwight Earl Jones, Derryn-Nicole Nesbitt and others
Defendant:
Judge Beth A. Buchanan, Trustee Margret Burks, Attorney LeAnn E. Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. Fink et al
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Booth
Defendant:
Scott Fink and Sean Dush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark White v. MDOC, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DENTIST SMITH and others
Booth v. Fink et al
as 2:2023cv11629
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Booth
Defendant:
Scott Fink and Sean Dush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
