Cases 51 - 60 of 13,780
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv11415
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Doe (KWS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Adroit Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Ms Loren Jane Owens
Defendant:
Adroit Health Group, American Business Association, Tyler Long and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.56.73.132
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe and John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 132
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Byrum v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Byrum
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, Glenn Jacobs, Tom Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. City of Chillicothe et al
as 2:2024cv02854
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R Fisher
Defendant:
City of Chillicothe, Luke Feeney, Jeffrey Carman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
