Cases 51 - 60 of 8,047
Turner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Danielle N. Turner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael Fleming v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELON FLEMING
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, BENNY N. NAPOLEON, MICHAEL KNAUS, 1st Shift Sgt. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Wellpath Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lee
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, Hayes, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weyerman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Joquette N. Weyerman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. United States
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hill
Defendant:
Heather N. Cooper and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Mastrogiovanni v. Sterling Heights, City of et al
as 5:2024cv10598
Plaintiff:
Richard Mastrogiovanni
Defendant:
Sterling Heights, City of, Shelby, Township of, N. Pomante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
